Fitch Affirms Sri Lanka’s Dialog Axiata at ‘AAA(lka)’/Stable

April 10, 2017

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SINGAPORE/COLOMBO, April 10 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Sri Lanka-based telecom company Dialog Axiata PLC’s National Long-Term Rating at ‘AAA(lka)’. The Outlook is Stable. KEY RATING DRIVERS Market-Leading Position: Dialog’s standalone credit profile of ‘AAA(lka)’ is underpinned by its market leadership in the expanding mobile and pay-TV segments. We believe Dialog is in a position to gain revenue market share from smaller telcos in light of its superior 3G/4G network capability. Its financial profile is solid, with moderate 2017 forecast FFO-adjusted net leverage of 1.2x-1.4x and stable operating EBITDAR margin of 34%-35% (2016: 35%). High Ratings Headroom: We believe Dialog could potentially receive support from its 83% Malaysian parent, Axiata Group Berhad (Axiata), if its standalone credit profile were to weaken. Dialog and its parent have moderate linkages, which include sharing key management personnel, a common brand name and common creditors. This could lead to reputational risk to Axiata should Dialog fail. Lower Revenue Growth: We expect Dialog’s revenue growth to slow to around 5%-6% in 2017 (2016: 17%), as consumers are likely to curb their voice and data usage due to higher taxes. The government budget for 2017, announced in November 2016, proposed increases in effective taxes on data services to 50%; effective taxes on voice and text were increased to 50% in November 2016. However, revenue growth is likely to recover in 2018, increasing by high-single-digit percentages, due to fast-growing data services. Stable Profitability: We forecast Dialog’s operating EBITDAR margin to remain stable at around 34%-35%, as larger economies of scale in the data segment offset falling profitability on voice and text segments. Strong data growth is supported by the proliferation of smartphones, with most new handsets sold being 4G-enabled. Negative FCF: We forecast Dialog to have negative FCF during 2017-2018, as cash flow from operations could fall short of the company’s ongoing large capex plan and dividend commitments. Dialog will continue to invest about 28%-30% of its revenue in capex annually to expand its 3G/4G networks and optical fibre infrastructure. Dividends are likely to increase to around LKR3.2 billion (2016: LKR2.6 billion). Debt-Funded Mergers and Acquisitions: Some industry consolidation is likely with ongoing intense competition in the mobile segment, where smaller telcos are unprofitable and face high investment requirements. Dialog and Sri Lanka Telecom PLC (SLT, B+/AAA(lka)/Stable) could acquire smaller telcos to strengthen their market position and consolidate spectrum assets. Dialog’s ratings have sufficient headroom for a debt-funded acquisition of a smaller telco for around LKR10 billion-12 billion. DERIVATION SUMMARY Dialog’s business profile is better than similarly rated national peers and is supported by its market leadership in Sri Lanka’s mobile industry, stable cash generation and integrated service offerings. Dialog has higher revenue and better operating EBITDAR margin than the fixed-line market leader, SLT, but this is offset by Dialog’s higher exposure to the crowded mobile market. Dialog’s forecast 2017 FFO-adjusted net leverage and FCF profile is better than that of SLT. SLT also has a larger capex plan relative to its EBITDA to expand fibre networks across Sri Lanka. Liquor company, Distilleries Company of Sri Lanka PLC (DIST, AAA(lka)/Rating Watch Negative) is Sri Lanka’s market leader in alcoholic beverage production. It benefits from a higher operating EBITDAR margin and stronger FCF generation than Dialog, supported by its ability to pass on tax increases to consumers. Dialog’s forecast leverage is similar to DIST, but compared with telcos, DIST faces higher regulatory risk, with frequent excise tax hikes. The Rating Watch Negative on DIST reflects a worsening financial profile and the risk of higher dividends to its parent. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch’s key assumptions within our rating case for Dialog include: – Slower revenue growth of 5%-6% in 2017 (2016: 17%) due to higher taxes. – Growth to recover from 2018 to a high-single-digit percentage, driven by data services. – Operating EBITDAR margin to remain stable at around 34%-35% during 2017-2018. – Capex/revenue to remain high at around 28%-30%. – Higher dividend payout during 2017-2018 of 3.2 billion (2016: LKR2.6 billion). – Negative FCF during 2017-2018. RATING SENSITIVITIES Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action There is no scope for an upgrade as Dialog is at the highest rating on the Sri Lankan national ratings scale. Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action – A significant dilution in Axiata’s ownership or board control of Dialog, removal of the common brand name or a weakening of the current moderate ties between the companies. – A decline in operating EBITDAR margin to below 20%, along with FFO-adjusted net leverage above 3.5x. LIQUIDITY Solid Liquidity: Dialog had a sufficient unrestricted cash balance of LKR7.2 billion and undrawn committed bank facilities of LKR19.5 billion at end-2016 to pay for its short-term debt maturities of about LKR7.9 billion. Dialog has strong access to local banks given it is among Sri Lanka’s largest corporates. Dialog’s debt mainly comprises of a USD150 million syndicated facility and LKR10 billion bank loan. Contact: Primary Analyst Nitin Soni Director +65 6796 7235 Fitch Ratings Singapore Pte Ltd One Raffles Quay, South Tower #22-11 Singapore 048583 Secondary Analyst Kanishka De Silva Analyst +94 11 254 1900 Committee Chairperson Steve Durose Managing Director +61 2 8256 0307 Note to editors: Fitch’s National Ratings provide a relative measure of creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The best risk within a country is rated ‘AAA’ and other credits are rated only relative to this risk. National Ratings are designed for use mainly by local investors in local markets, and are signified by the addition of an identifier for the country concerned, such as ‘AAA(lka)’ for National Ratings in Sri Lanka. Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable. Media Relations: Bindu Menon, Mumbai, Tel: +91 22 4000 1727, Email:; Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Criteria for Rating Non-Financial Corporates (pub. 10 Mar 2017) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Additional Disclosures Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001